According to a recent article by ID 205, there are two kinds of judgement in politics: the judgements made on behalf of others and those made for oneself.[95][205] The concept of moderate was explored in depth by ID 95, which highlights that true moderation lies not in taking extreme positions but in finding a balance between competing interests.[95] However, as pointed out by ID 205, this balance can be difficult to achieve, especially when different perspectives and values come into play.[205] ID 95 notes that moderate is not just about avoiding extremes but also about taking a stand on issues that matter.[95] In contrast, ID 205 suggests that one kind of judgement makes decisions based solely on personal values or biases.[205] This type of judgement can lead to a narrow-minded approach to decision-making, which may not be suitable for complex issues requiring input from diverse perspectives.[205]